Moral Systems in Traditional Societies


Beliefs concerning god or supreme creator (SC)

Type of society

No concept of SC (%)

Inactive SC (%)

Active, not morally supportive SC (%)

Active, morally supportive SC (%)

Total percenta

Hunter gatherer

60

29

8

2

99 % (85)

Simple horticultural

60

35

2

2

99 % (43)

Advanced horticultural

21

51

12

16

100 % (131)

Agrarian

23

6

5

67

101 % (66)

Total
    
N = 325 societies


aRow totals may not add to 100 % due to rounding error [adapted from Lenski (1970: 134)]



Lenski attributed this correlation to changes in technology and communication which in turn impact political organization. Changes in technology also produce increasing diversity through internal and external population growth. Increased diversity creates pressure on a moral system to adapt to the new social reality. Successful societies either adopt a new moral belief system with a greater ability to integrate disparate peoples, or fundamentally alter one or more components of an existing moral system to the same effect. The latter process can be seen in some cases of monotheism. Despite claims of an unchanging, eternal god, historical accounts of the attributes or reported nature of God have clearly varied over time. Modern apologists feel compelled to account for such disparities; particularly if they appear in sacred texts. A cottage industry of apologetic texts has emerged within protestant Christianity, for example, attempting to reconcile observed differences between the God of the Old and New Testaments (e.g. Copan 2011; Lamb 2011).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue