Business Acquisitions as a Tool for Proactive Financial Management: The Case of Seanergy Maritime Holdings




Date of IPO


Date of IPO

Eagle Bulk Shipping

June 2005

Excel Maritime

February 1989

TBS Internationalb

June 2005

Diana Shipping

March 2005


December 2005

Genco Shipping

July 2005

Star Bulk Carriers

December 2005

Paragon Shipping

August 2007
Navios Maritime
Seanergy Maritime

September 2007


November 2007

Globus Maritime

June 2007

Safe Bulkers

May 2008
Baltic Trading

March 2010

aIn the event that some companies have listed their shares on the NASDAQ or on the NYSE after initially going public on a different exchange, the IPO date will not coincide with the listing date

bDelisted in 2012

The agglomeration of dry bulk company listings in NASDAQ has to do with the increased transparency in financial reporting and strict corporate governance associated with a listing in the United States. At the same time, the reporting requirements for foreign stock issuers, such as shipping companies, allow flexibility which was particularly relevant in the case of Seanergy. High standards of corporate governance are considered crucial for all company stakeholders and a listing on NASDAQ acts as a testament of increased reporting transparency and accountability to investors. Furthermore, the high level of development in the financial services industry in the U.S. also makes it easier for ship-owners to contact lending institutions, investment banks, underwriters, and potential investors willing to subscribe to a share offering. Additionally, stock exchanges in the U.S. are the largest in terms of transaction volumes and attract a highly diversified investor base, as opposed to other bourses that lack the same international orientation. What is more important is that United States stock exchanges, such as the NASDAQ, enjoy increased liquidity and consequently lower transaction costs. This allows investors to trade in a company’s stock and consequently results in a premium valuation compared to companies listed on less liquid exchanges. Another important reason for choosing the NASDAQ is the presence of an industry peer group that allows analysts to compare companies and provide stock valuations.

At the time of the six initial vessel acquisitions, the BDI index, which measures the cost of transporting dry bulk commodities across various routes, was close to its all-time high and so the vessels earned very high charter rates (see Figs., and 7.4).


Fig. 7.1
The Baltic Capesize Index Time Charter Average


Fig. 7.2
The Baltic Panamax Index Time Charter Average


Fig. 7.3
The Baltic Supramax Index Time Charter Average


Fig. 7.4
The Baltic Handysize Index Time Charter Average

The above four graphs present the time series of average daily time charter rate paid for each of the four major types of dry bulk vessels. From the graphs, it can be seen that market rates for all vessel types peaked in May 2008. The healthy shipping market prevailing at the time enabled Seanergy to adopt a business model based on paying high dividends to shareholders out of internally generated cash flows. Besides, the relationship with the major shareholder and the options to purchase two additional vessels afforded the Company attractive growth prospects. Following the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the ensuing financial crisis, the BDI retreated by about 90 % compared to its previous peak and reached a low in December 2008. This prompted Seanergy’s Management to suspend dividend payments from February 2009 onwards, with a view to conserving the company’s cash during a volatile period. Furthermore, a waiver on the security margin covenant which is calculated as the ratio of fleet market value to net debt was obtained from Marfin Bank, as the precipitous fall in the dry bulk market caused a corresponding decrease in the market value of Seanergy’s vessels. During this time, the aforementioned EBITDA earn-out clause in the purchase agreement of the vessels proved particularly useful as it provided the charterers with the incentive to continue to pay high charter rates for Seanergy vessels, whereas in the absence of that clause, it would clearly be in their interest to renegotiate the charters at considerably lower rates. In this way, Seanergy generated free cash flows throughout the term of the contracts.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue