11 INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DISPUTE BOARD RULES
Chapter 11
International Chamber of Commerce Dispute Board Rules
Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils (FIDIC)
International Chamber of Commerce, International Court of Arbitration
ICC Dispute Board Rules (DB Rules)
Procedural timeline in formal referrals or disputes
Dispute adjudication boards (DABs)
Background to the revision of the ICC DB Rules
Revised standard ICC DB clauses
ICC DAB, followed by ICC arbitration if required
Major changes to the ICC DB Rules
Dispute resolution “road map”
“The ICC Dispute Board Rules (even though, until now, not frequently used by practitioners) comprise all relevant elements necessary for an efficient dispute board procedure. In this respect, they can easily compete with the dispute board rules established by the FIDIC contracts. The same applies to the time-frame provided for the decision-making process. Taking into account that the ICC Dispute Board Centre, in addition to that, grants the parties subsidiary assistance in the dispute board process itself, it is to be expected that these rules elaborated and established by the ICC will gain more and more importance in the future.”1
11.2 Litigation in the state courts:
- .1 Technology and Construction Court (in England and Wales);
- .2 Other jurisdictions: few specialist courts.
11.3 Mediation:
- .1 Chinese origins;
- .2 Enthusiastic adoption in the United States of America;
- .3 Less enthusiastic uptake in the European Union.
11.4 Adjudication:
- .1 Contractual and statutory background in the United Kingdom and other common (and now civil) law jurisdictions;
- .2 FIDIC contracts, as adopted by the World Bank (WB) and other development banks, and
- .3 Institutional rules.
Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils (FIDIC)
11.5 FIDIC is Geneva-based organisation, whose forms derive from these of the Institution of Civil Engineers and which originally had the employer’s “engineer” as the first-tier dispute resolver. FIDIC deals with large multinational infrastructure projects through a dispute review system, such as the milestone 1980 case “EI Cajon” (dam and hydroelectric facility) in Honduras, where a dispute resolution board (DRB) was originally used, as sponsored by the WB.
Key dates
11.6
- .1 Early in 1990: Procurement for Works (a WB publication) was published, inter alia, modifying the FIDIC contract, with provisions for DRBs and non-binding recommendations and opinions.
- .2 Between 1995 and 1996: FIDIC followed suit: new version of design, build (DB) contract and optional amendment to its standard form construction contracts; both documents introduced DABs.
- .3 Later, a divide occurred between traditional DRBs (non-binding recommendations) and DABs (interim binding decisions): FIDIC removed the engineer as the first-tier dispute decider, where the DAB option was incorporated.
- .4 In 1999: FIDIC published its revised forms of contract: DAB was the principal means of dispute review in contractual mechanisms, as follows:
- .4.1 Red Book (Construction): DAB established at the outset,
- .4.2 Yellow Book (Plant and Design Build), and
- .4.3 Silver Book (EPC/Turkney): DAB establishment deferred until a dispute arises.
- .4.1 Red Book (Construction): DAB established at the outset,
- .5 In 2000: WB published the new edition of Procurement of Works: moving away from US model DRBs (non-binding recommendations), towards FIDIC-style DRBs. The WB contract therefore adopts the DRB (interim binding recommendations) and the engineer no longer has a quasi-judicial rôle with the WB and FIDIC embarking upon the harmonisation of its DRB/DAB provisions. Likewise, other development banks, such as the EBRO and Asian Development Bank, also become involved in the harmonisation process.
- .6 In 2005: new contract conditions were published by FIDIC and were adopted by all leading development banks utilising DRBs.
International Chamber of Commerce, International Court of Arbitration
11.7 This has published the following suite of documents:
- .1 Rules of Arbitration: latest revision in force as from 1 January 2012, including administered arbitration and an emergency arbitrator provision;
- .2 Mediation Rules: latest version in force as from 1 January 2014;
- .3 DB Rules: latest version in force as from 1 September 2014;
- .4 Rules for Expertise: in force as from 1 January 2003;
- .5 International Centre for ADR, based in Paris, France;
- .6 DOCDEX procedure for trade finance.